So you know D’s kids are living with their mother. A week ago D sent an e-mail (to their mother) asking if he could write a letter to L and A. This was her response:
“This would not be in the best interest of L and A, therefore, my answer is no.”
Now, as a mother, I don’t understand how a letter could hurt a child. I mean it’s in writing, she could read it and block out anything that she didn’t “agree” with. So that is weird enough right? Well, listen to this. D then asked her if she would send a current picture of L and A so he could have one. At first she responded with a yes. This morning, we received this e-mail from her:
“While I appreciate the pleasantries, I know nothing has changed with your circumstances. In fact I understand they have become worse. Therefore making your requests and motive very questionable. For the protection and best intrest of L and A, at this time, there will be no contact of any kind and I am not sending a picture. N ”
Seriously, how could a picture hurt L and A? And even if our situation was worse, which it isn’t, how does our situation have anything to do with her sending a picture? I mean is D going to telepathically speak to L&A through a picture? What motive could there be in wanting a picture of his kids? I am a mom. I can understand reasonable worries about ones children, but this? It just blows me away!
Here is a woman who became a lesbian, left her husband, worked at strip club and found some rich guy to marry. The guy she married by the way has had three DUI’s. In addition, he has been sued for non-payment of a real-estate investment where he stole 12,000.00 from the poor souls who wanted to buy his property. He has been suspended in Idaho from building any property due to his deceit. I don’t bring this up to prove how “bad” she and her new husband are, only to point out that no one is perfect. We all make mistakes, but mistakes shouldn’t keep a father from his children. There are men in prison who have more rights to their children than she allows D.
Yet somehow D’s motives are questionable? He wants is a picture of HIS kids. Here is a man who has committed no crime (with the exception of minor in consumption as teenager) and now works at a facility where, in order to become employed one has to go through an extensive back ground investigation. So if you could keep this in your prayers, please do. We can only hope God will restore L&A to their father sooner rather than later.
Unfortunately this reminds me of a dateline special MSNBC aired about a man who had his son kidnapped by his Brazilian ex-wife. She took their son and remarried a rich guy who happened to be a lawyer. After the woman died, the step-father continued to deny visitation to the father and filed numerous court proceedings preventing the father from any contact with his son. While my heart goes out to the father, it irked me somewhat that MSNBC has neglected the numerous father’s this happens to right here in the United States.
Somehow, a woman is viewed more favorably by the courts. It’s almost as if a woman can get away with whatever she wants when it comes to children in the family court system. Especially if a woman has money. I don’t understand how this is allowed when there are more than enough studies to prove that children who are raised without both biological parents grow up to have numerous problems.
It leaves me thinking…how does this happen? D isn’t the only father in this situation…I can think of two others right off the top of my head. It really is disgraceful. Just sickening.